fatoprofugus.net
responding to internal stimuli
eye 8 infiniti

This Modern World by Tom Tomorrow
The Agonist
Eschaton
Informed Comment
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Matthew Yglesias
The Washington Monthly
Wonkette

last days of the republic
year 229 of the great experiment
a chronicle of the depradations of W and his Imperialist Horde
a proud member of the Reality Based Community S.O.S.!!!
God save the Republic

       
 


Blogarama


Listed on Blogwise
Subscribe with Bloglines
Technorati Profile
 
 
too bad 2004.Jun.29 16:59

It really pisses me off when people tell me that I'm just swallowing the mainstream liberal line. Let me tell you, as a guy who voted for Nader in 2000 (and you can't blame me for what happened in that debacle because my state went decisively to the Democrats anyway, and all I wanted to do was get the Green Party's 3% so that they could get some federal matching funds in 2004 and make things a little interesting), I'm not your average hippie, pot-smoking liberal.

Conservatives like to play off this backlash against the neocons as being based on some irrational hatred of George W Bush. This is presumptious and is quite revealing how narrow-minded these people are.

I've got plenty of rational reasons to hate George W Bush.

Fact of the matter is that W is actively screwing people I care about and people whom I identify with. As a person-of-color working in service of minority, poor populations, many of the policies that W and his Republican cronies have enacted have made my job harder and have made the lives of the people I serve harder.

Consider that my family is not in the top tier of income earned. This means that we are more sensitive to the rise and fall of the economy, and while tax cuts are nice, they're pretty useless when you aren't paying taxes anyways, and even more useless if you haven't got a job. The $400 we got from the tax cut basically helped out for like a week.

And lest you believe that W has nothing to do with how the economy is tanking, just consider that a lot of the business we are losing is due to the fact that a lot of people in the world either hate us right now or feel that doing business with Americans is highly risky.

Those job numbers? Cooked up bullshit. Ask any of my friends who are desperately trying to go back to school because they can't find a job that doesn't involve flipping hamburgers, despite being perfectly intelligent people with bachelor degrees from pretty good universities. People who have quit looking for a job aren't counted in those unemployment counts. If you're a Republican with a nice, secure job with benefits and you're trying to tell us that we're just lazy and need to get motivated, well, in the immortal words of good ol' Dick Cheney, you can go fuck yourself. I'd like to see you on the pavement, hustling after those shady leads, trying to figure out where next month's rent is coming from.

And it's interesting how a lot of those guys who got killed in Iraq have Hispanic or Middle Eastern last names. Still, it's no surprise. I think most people-of-color recognize just exactly who gets shot first when there's a war on. Note that it is usually not rich, white people.

Am I really safer these days, now that W decided to poke the hornet's nest with a stick? The recruitment rate for Al Qaeda is probably at an all-time high. Most Iraqis would have probably shunned bin Laden, but now that Abu Ghraib has come up, we are doing a lot of Al Qaeda's recruitment work. (Although, what's new, considering that Reagan helped train these guys!)

And you know what, if another September 11-like event happened tomorrow, W's administration ought to take the blame. For not figuring out a system to protect us since two-years ago. For weakening our intelligence agencies by having them track down false leads (like the Niger-Iraqi yellowcake connection) and outing undercover agents (like Valerie Plame). For not listening to our intelligence agencies when they're shouting at the top of their lungs with specific details about what's going to go down. The whole point of the government is to protect its people, and if another September 11-like event occurs, W will have clearly failed.

So, again, there are plenty of rational reasons to hate W, and plenty of rational reasons for wanting a regime change now, despite the indubitable increased instability of the world these days. We shouldn't be stupid and just let the useless rock known as the Republican Party drag us down into the abyss of "staying the course."

If we're going to fight theocratic, oppressive regimes, we need to start at home. We need to restore the Constitution (which the Supreme Court is finally attempting to uphold) and we need to reestablish the checks and balances. The President is not a King, and when he lets us down, he needs to go, plain and simple. The government works for us, otherwise, they're out of there. And remember that our government was founded by men who preferred freedom over security.

If we are going to fight the War on Terror, we need to go into it as a free people, in the spirit of our Constitution. We really need to remember the Cold War, and how (regardless of reality) Reagan played up the idea that freedom is stronger than oppression. We must lead by example, show our enemies that we are seriously committed to a better, freer world. This means upholding our Constitution and respecting civil liberties. Anything short of this is surrendering to the terrorists.

permalink | 0 writebacks

who would jesus torture? 2004.Jun.27 11:06

It comes down to this question: Is America a Christian nation or not? If not, then we must quickly jettison the fanatic Christian Coalition into the cesspool of all things un-American. In the immortal words of our great vice-president, go fuck yourselves, guys.

If America is a Christian nation, then there is absolutely no way to justify what happened in Abu Ghraib.

Unlike sex, you can't have it both ways, guys. (Talk about flip-flopping.)

I particularly like Ron Reagan, Jr.'s sardonic question: Who would Jesus drag around on a dog's leash?

I also like Sharia's tendency to make the punishment fit the crime. If America is unwilling to be held to international law, then I think it is fitting that Iraqis get to try these criminals. In any case, we must throw the book at the criminals who allowed this debacle to happen. Even if it includes W and his Dick.

permalink | 0 writebacks

you're a dick, dick 2004.Jun.24 18:20

Dickhead Cheney has decided to stop mincing words. The VP tells Senator Pat Leahy to go fuck himself. Hahahaha! Where are those goddamn Puritans screaming for his blood, demanding he be punished for his sacrilege, huh?

permalink | 1 writebacks

white people 2 2004.Jun.23 20:56

While I admire this high school student's attempt to withstand a public school administration (which, I do not doubt, is replete with left-leaning fascistic tendencies—the legacy of the '60's and it's misguided dependence on corporatization and centralization—other such legacies include the humongous derelict Section 8 housing developments in such cities as New York and Chicago—I do not claim that the left is all good), what he is spewing is just utter bullshit. The misinformation of the right wing.

The thing that people don't get is that this isn't about left and right. There are extremist wackos on both ends. The real question is whether we are all just going to kill each other, or if someone can actually pull it together so that we don't kill each other quite as often.

I think, at this particular point in time, the left (and I'm talking about the grassroots progressive left of the 21st century embodied by people like Howard Dean, by Gavin Newsom, by Barack Obama, not the left that is the remnant of the failed revolution of the 1960s, the left wing that wanted to be the Establishment but let Reagan somehow get elected) is doing a better job of creating environments of tolerance that allow people-of-color and other minorities like me to live lives at least vaguely resembling the American Dream. The left is currently more faithful to the Founding Fathers' vision of America—the ideas of Jefferson and Madison, the idea that government exists to protect the individual from the tyranny of the majority. If you don't agree with me, fine, just don't force me to believe your bullshit either. In contrast, all the right does is ram opinions down your throat, and failing that, they try to incite hatred against you. Like this kid is doing. And they make shit up all the time, too. No basis in fact whatsoever. And even when there is basis in fact, the point is not to promote understanding, but to polarize and, eventually, demonize. The future is looking real bright these days.

permalink | 0 writebacks

white people 2004.Jun.23 20:29

Sisyphus Shrugged tells it straight up. It's not terror if white people do it. At least that's what seems to be running through Asscroft's head. In the NY Times, Paul Krugman points out the case of William Krar, who was found to be in possession of a cyanide bomb capable of asphyxiating quite a large number of people. In other words, Krar had more weapons of mass destruction than Saddam did. Newsworthy? Of course not. What was I thinking?

permalink | 0 writebacks

orange county sucks 2004.Jun.21 20:13

I'm not talking about the stupid sitcom, either. Seriously, Orange County sucks goat balls. If I had to choose between living in hell or living in Orange County, I'd have to think about it for a while.

So while my sister was at her boyfriend's graduation at UC Irvine, these idiots were protesting the sincere profession of faith by Muslim students as they graduated from this institution of higher learning.

Thank you, Bill O'Reilly, for inciting your ignorant viewers. You are a massive tool.

Can we say "racist" and "bigotted"? Why doesn't Orange County just put a sign up at the county line stating that they don't like brown or black people? A burning cross on the I-5 might do the trick, too.

permalink | 7 writebacks

bush is the anti-christ? 2004.Jun.21 19:25

W's strategy for uniting the world is interesting. He has managed in uniting previously hostile ethnicities and factions against the United States. First there was the European Union, then there were the Sunni and Shia Muslims in Iraq. And now Pakistanis and Indians Indian Muslims and Indian Hindus are joining to protest W.

As I've said before, if Jesus said that he would cause division, and if W says that he's a uniter, not a divider, doesn't that make W the anti-Christ?

permalink | 0 writebacks

it's the economy, stupid 2004.Jun.17 14:22

Oliver Willis outlines a hypothetical situation, and also wonders about the non-ending warlike nature of out-and-out capitalism.

The example about the computer programmer losing his job versus two new burger-flipping positions created highlights the ludicrousness of the right-wing's insistence on a burgeoning economy. To put it simply, a shit job does not equal prosperity.

permalink | 0 writebacks

bitch 2004.Jun.17 13:27

I'm sorry. I hate to sound misogynistic, but, this is one sad whining bitch backing the wrong side.

What a display of pathetic self-hatred. I wonder if she even acknowledges the fact that she is Filipino American, with immigrant parents? (OK, I know that she does acknowledge these bare facts, but really, her writing is so filled with colonial mentality and non-white self-hatred that it's just as good as disavowing these facts.)

Yes, I know the party-line about how being anti-"illegal immigration" is not the same as being against immigration in toto, but the contradictions of being a middle-to-upper class conservative and being against "illegal immigration" are so mind-boggling. Still, I do understand that the average conservative is not renowned for being intelligent and logical.

Bottom line: the cush lifestyles that these cynical bastards live are untenable without the cheap labor that undocumented workers provide. You either lose one or the other. I'll buy their bullshit the day they renounce their five bedroom houses and gigantic SUVs, fire their maids, quit hiring folk at the Home Depot, and get on their hands and knees to clean their own toilets. Until then, hating on undocumented workers is just as good as hating on immigrants in general. And hating on immigrants in general when you are a person-of-color and are the daughter of immigrants yourself is, to put it simply, stupid.

I am not even going to point out the fact that, historically, most Americans (especially white Americans) were illegal immigrants. Any Native American or Mexican could probably tell you that.

permalink | 0 writebacks

principles 2004.Jun.15 14:24

RR may have created policy that caused really horrible things to happen to a lot of people, but the gap between his brand of conservatism and W's theocratic leaning was brought to fore in this NYT article about how the Reagan family wants to dissociate themselves from the Bush administration.

permalink | 0 writebacks

bilingualism 2004.Jun.15 14:13

<low-blow> Maybe Reagan should have learned some Spanish. Being Bilingual Protects Against Some Age-related Cognitive Changes.

permalink | 0 writebacks

the big dog 2004.Jun.15 13:46

I hope that I'll live long enough to see American politics return to vigorous debates where we argue who's right and wrong, not who's good and bad—Bill Clinton

permalink | 0 writebacks

doomed youth 2004.Jun.14 05:12

Tom Tomorrow makes the point that it is possible that the most ardent Reagan fans are people who weren't even old enough to remember his presidency. Given the general level of intelligence suggested by their writing ability (as evidenced by the hate mail received by Ted Rall for suggesting that Ronald Reagan is probably burning in hell right now), I tend to believe it.

Thankfully, not everyone is as deluded about our 40th president. In the Los Angeles Times last week, there was an article about how blacks and gays pretty much hate Reagan. A clinical neuroscience professor of mine once remarked about how he could already tell that Reagan was suffering from dementia during the Reagan-Carter debates, and how a lot of his colleagues also noticed this as well.

And then everyone oh-so-conveniently forgets Iran-Contra.

But, oh well. Stupid people tend to get what they deserve in the end.

permalink | 0 writebacks

better than a james bond movie 2004.Jun.13 20:48

wow, this is some crazy shit. it makes a lot of sense though. oil = money. money = power. oil is a finite resource. the new world order has suddenly become a zero sum game.

the thing is, it's kind of like when you find out that the meteor is heading straight for earth. it's just a little too late to do anything about it.

permalink | 0 writebacks

reagan and people of color 2004.Jun.13 19:13

Wow. Even I was surprised at the amount of vitriol directed against the Gipper on this blog.

Although I think that how you feel about Reagan is an excellent litmus test for what kind of politics you have.

I feel that my lack of feeling and lack of interest points to my centrist leanings. (Which most wingnuts would call "communism," but their heads are so far down their right-sided assholes that I'm not surprised at all.)

In my mind, RR was dead a long time ago. Probably during his second term. I mean, it showed. Long before he physically died, the media was already referring to him in the past tense.

permalink | 0 writebacks

reagan 2004.Jun.06 14:40

Once upon a time, I thought Ronald Reagan was cool. But despite the inexorable conservatism of my family, I eventually grew up into a progressive. Which is probably a pretty typical story. What makes my family's conservatism nuanced is that they are people-of-color immigrants, and as the Right shows there true colors, and increasingly racist, sexist, and homophobic acts become manifest, their faith in the Right has significantly eroded.

The anti-Catholic, anti-person-of-color, anti-working-class segments of the Right have not done much to endear themselves to my erstwhile Republican family members.

But, anyway, Reagan.

The thing that most significantly sets Ronald Reagan apart from W is that, while we all lived under the terror of nuclear annihilation, Reagan somehow managed to spin things optimistically. It doesn't matter that a lot of things they told us were completely bullshit—such as the U.S.S.R.'s actual military capabilities and their economic strength—at least he didn't try to keep us completely terrified, and actually offered a ray of hope. Even when he didn't really intend to do anything to help the millions of Americans who were consigned to poverty.

As cynical as that is, I still find it preferrable to W's and Ashcroft's constant, vague "terror warnings." It is becoming increasingly clear to the average Joe on the street that this is all just very Orwellian and that all they're really interested in doing is keeping us under control. Because if we're supposed to take terror warnings seriously, why didn't the administration take the CIA and FBI and the Clinton administration seriously?

I remember, in the immediate aftermath of September 11th, how disappointed I was in W. He didn't say anything to give us hope out of this tragedy. He just did his best to keep us scared. All he did was vow vengeance. All he did was feed blood lust. What his speeches made me feel was that we were in a state of siege, and another attack was impending. Whether this was intentional, or whether W was truly terrified as well, is almost immaterial. I know that both Clinton and Reagan would've done a better job in bolstering our faith in the military, in our intelligence community, in our justice system. Instead of blatantly dismantling the Constitution, they would've reminded us what it means to be American. Nevermind that behidn the scenes, either of them, Republican or Democrat, probably would've been forced to strip away parts of the Constitution. The fact of the matter is that it served the purposes of W and his cronies to keep us scared, and neither Clinton or Reagan would've stooped to such depths.

I recognize that politics has only a coincidental intersection with reality, and for a politician to not even be able to competently keep up illusion is a very sorry state of affairs.

I just have this feeling that even Reagan would've been disappointed at what the Republican Party has become.

permalink | 0 writebacks

no intelligence 2004.Jun.06 14:23

George Tenet's resignation is analyzed in the context of the various setbacks the Bush administration has experienced these past few weeks, culminating with W having to hire an outside lawyer. Not only is Chalabi's double agency a current topic, but the Plame affair is also at last coming to fore. (Visions of W in an orange jumpsuit are practically left-wing pornography)

What is interesting is that the Slate article thinks that Tenet's resignation is more likely a liability to the current administration than an advantage. Regardless of what is really going on behind the scenes, it seems clear that a large contingent of the intelligence community is not willing to continue to back this horse, particularly at the real expense of our national security.

W and his cronies have single-handledly done more to dismantle our intelligence gathering capabilities than all the years of the Cold War did.

permalink | 0 writebacks

miserable failure 2004.Jun.06 14:14

This is humorous. Thanks to the wonders of Google's search algorithm, if you search for "miserable failure," George W Bush's biography comes up at the top.

(Somehow discovered on Glutter)

permalink | 0 writebacks

the mainstream gets it right 2004.Jun.06 14:10

Wow. This was in Newsweek (found through Atrios)

When George W. Bush makes his D-Day anniversary visit to the Normandy beaches on Sunday, we're going to hear a lot of well-honed speeches trying to compare the righteous combat forced on us in World War II with the war of choice we've entered into in Iraq. But only speechmakers from coddled, comfortable backgrounds who've never heard a shot fired in anger, much less seen "dead men by mass production," would dare use the blood of those who died at Normandy 60 years ago to try to cleanse their conscience of those dying in Iraq today.
….
…Sixty years ago, those who thought they could teach the world how to live the only right way, which was their way, and launched unprovoked wars claiming this was the only thing could do to defend their values—those were the people we called the enemy.
But let's be clear about the soldiers. Our soldiers. Those men and women in Iraq today are, indeed, just as heroic as those at Normandy. They have been put in the wrong place at the wrong time for the wrong reasons, but that's not their fault. They are fighting and dying and trying to build something good as soldiers, despite the most foolhardy civilian leadership in the modern history of the United States. …

permalink | 0 writebacks

beating tricky dick 2004.Jun.05 08:16

Bush lawyers up. What could this mean?

permalink | 0 writebacks

content ©2003 juan tomás kalayaan paine

contact me via

The design for this page was adapted from bkenoah's design Architect, which can be found at Open Source Web Design Download the sample page.